REblog- Argue Without Being Argumentative- Mikel Del Rosario

Argue Without Being Argumentative

original post at www.apologeticsguy.com

 

Argue Without Being Argumentative

Who likes to argue? Depends what you mean.

Unfortunately, apologists use words which could give people the wrong impression: “Apologetics” sounds like apologizing. “Defense” sounds like training for hand-to-hand combat. And “argue” sounds like the thing you hate doing with your family on the way to church!

Clarifying key terms can help you overcome a few challenges associated with offering apologetics training to your group. First, let’s turn to the Random House Dictionary:

ar·gue (ahr-gue). verb.

1. To present reasons for or against a thing. He argued in favor of capital punishment.

2. To contend in oral disagreement. Senators argued with the President about the new tax bill.

3. To state the reasons for or against. Lawyers argued the case.

I include this definition in my handouts. It’s important to explain early on that when apologists say “argue,” we don’t mean getting into shouting matches. After all, Paul said we shouldn’t be jerks who go around looking for a fight (2 Tim. 2:24):

 

read more at www.apologeticsguy.com

Comments are closed.

  • “Christian apologetics involves the presentation and defense of Christianity as an integrated worldview that is objectively, universally, and absolutely true, reasonable, knowable, and existentially pertinent to both individuals and entire cultures. Apologetics involves rebutting unbelieving accusations against Christianity (2 Corinthians 10:3-5; Jude 3) as well as giving a constructive and persuasive case for Christian theism (Philippians 1:7; 1 Peter 3:15).” -Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 425 other followers